Criminal Defense Lawyer in Sumter, SC

Playoff scores from high school football action around Columbia and South Carolina.

——Nov. 22——

——Class 5A Division I——

Upper State

Dutch Fork 42, Boiling Springs 14

River Bluff 34, Rock Hill 17 (Thursday)

JL Mann 44, Clover 14

Spartanburg 37, Byrnes 17

Lower State

Summerville 36, Fort Dorchester 13

Ridge View 22, Cane Bay 15

James Island 31, Carolina Forest 21

Sumter 55, Ashley Ridge 24

——Nov. 29——

Upper State

River Bluff at Dutch Fork

JL Mann at Spartanburg

Lower State

Ridge View at Summerville

James Island at Sumter

——Class 5A Division II——

Upper State

Northwestern 49, Indian Land 6

Greenwood 28, Hillcrest 21

TL Hanna 57, Catawba Ridge 34

Gaffney 41, Riverside 21

Lower State

Irmo 38, Chapin 7

West Florence 34, North Myrtle Beach 3

Berkeley 36, Westwood 0

White Knoll 39, Myrtle Beach 19

——Nov. 29——

Upper State

Greenwood at Northwestern

TL Hanna at Gaffney

Lower State

West Florence at Irmo

White Knoll at Berkeley

——Class 4A——

Upper State

Westside 49, AC Flora 9

Camden 43, Wren 42

South Pointe 56, Greer 17

Daniel 48, Richland Northeast 36

Lower State

Hartsville 49, Darlington 16

South Florence 56, Hilton Head Island 28

Gilbert 36, Bishop England 30

North Augusta 36, May River 6

——Nov. 29——

Upper State

Camden at Westside

South Pointe at Daniel

Lower State

South Florence at Hartsville

Gilbert at North Augusta

——Class 3A——

Upper State

Mountain View Prep 42, Walhalla 19

Crescent 42, Christ Church 6

Powdersville 21, Woodruff 14

Belton-Honea Path 42, Palmetto 14

Lower State

Loris 28, Hanahan 21

Keenan 38, Orangeburg-Wilkinson 7

Dillon 33, Newberry 28

Oceanside Collegiate 36, Waccamaw 6

——Nov. 29——

Upper State

Crescent at Mountain View Prep

Powdersville at Belton-Honea Path

Lower State

Keenan at Loris

Dillon at Oceanside Collegiate

——Class 2A——

Upper State

Clinton 48, Chester 20

Batesburg-Leesville 49, Andrew Jackson 14

Fairfield Central 41, Chesnee 6

Central 26, Saluda 15

Lower State

Barnwell 21, Timberland 0

Cheraw 35, East Clarendon 0

Manning 28, Hampton County 27

Philip Simmons 40, Kingstree 24

——Nov. 29——

Upper State

Batesburg-Leesville at Clinton

Central at Fairfield Central

Lower State

Cheraw at Barnwell

Philip Simmons at Manning

——Class A——

Upper State

Abbeville 41, Blackville-Hilda 13

Lamar 22, Lee Central 12

Hunter-Kinard Tyler 46, Dixie 13

Lewisville 46, Ridge Spring-Monetta 8

Lower State

Cross 56, Ridgeland 0

Hannah-Pamplico 40, Denmark-Olar 6

Lake View 21, Johnsonville 14

Bamberg-Ehrhardt 36, Baptist Hill 20

——Nov. 29——

Upper State

Lamar at Abbeville

Hunter-Kinard-Tyler at Lewisville

Lower State

Hannah-Pamplico at Cross

Bamberg-Ehrhardt at Lake View

——Championship Schedule——

Friday, Nov. 22

Class 4A: Hammond 28, Porter Gaud 21

8-Man: Richard Winn 43, Laurens Academy 6

Saturday, Nov. 23, all games at Charleston Southern

Class A: Thomas Heyward 23, Williamsburg Academy 8

Class 2A: Pee Dee Academy 52, Bethesda 14

Class 3A: Pinewood Prep 24, Wilson Hall 21

This story was originally published November 22, 2024, 6:45 PM.

You can understand why Sumter officials don’t want to talk about their fancy-schmancy “welcome center” next door to Shaw Air Force Base, which locks out the public and welcomes only a select few.

Well, make that “our” welcome center, since South Carolina taxpayers have kicked in at least $1.5 million for the $3.4 million lodge-like complex and are in the process of distributing another $4.3 million to “revitalize” a barn into an even larger meeting space. With no public plans to open it to the public.

As The Post and Courier’s Tony Bartelme and Seth Taylor report in the latest installment of our Uncovered investigative series, the lodge is set on 900 acres of mostly undeveloped forests, ponds and fields and hosts private hunts for specially invited VIPs under circumstances that are not entirely clear. Also not entirely clear is who is allowed to use the lodge, which has accommodations for overnight guests and features a $10,301 conference table made of ancient cypress and a $14,218 security camera system at the gate to keep out the great unwashed.

Sumter bought land to preserve Shaw Air Force Base, then built a hunting hideaway for officials

Mr. Bartelme and Mr. Taylor tried to get more information about who can access the gated property and who can't, how much it costs to operate, where the money to operate it comes from and its use as what is essentially a private hunt club. They tried to get a site tour. They finally published what they know after being put off for three weeks by officials who say they really want to explain things but are just too busy.

It already had taken five months just to pry basic public information out of the city, and that came with a hefty price tag, even though most governments provide basic public information at no charge and in a matter of days, as state law encourages them to do for matters of public interest. But if you’re trying to hide your secretive hunt club, it probably doesn’t feel to you like it's in the public interest to answer questions about it.

Even after receiving $1,098 to hand over public records, Sumter is still refusing to release some records that state law very clearly makes public, including the personnel records of a caretaker who previously worked at a private hunt club, is paid $81,000 a year by the city and is allowed to live rent-free in a three-bedroom house on the property.

Scoppe: From fired superintendent to 12-year-old mom, what's really private under SC law

Certainly, this posh welcome center isn’t the only example of public property that’s off-limits to the general public. We can’t just barge into the governor’s mansion whenever we want, for instance. For that matter, we can’t push past the welcome desk into the governor’s office, or the offices of the directors of state agencies or state legislative leaders, or most state employees.

But most people would agree that we should provide a nice house for the governor to live in and that we should provide office space for the governor and other public officials to work in. More to the point, most people know that we provide a nice house for the governor, and office space for public officials.

Most people do not know that taxpayers have been forced to spend millions on a private “welcome center” in Sumter that operates like an exclusive hunt club to entertain selected state and local officials and military personnel. Or that we’re being forced to spend millions more to expand it for reasons that nobody is willing to explain.

Scoppe: It's a favorite sport of SC officials; maybe we should start crowning champions

The whole mess serves as yet another reminder that the Legislature needs to put some teeth into the S.C. Freedom of Information Act to force officials to comply with it and to make it more difficult to delay and price the public out of getting some accountability and transparency from their government. No, the taxpayers shouldn’t have to subsidize fishing expeditions, but neither should government be able to run the clock and use inflated costs to deter people from finding out how government is spending their money.

It’s also a useful reminder of the problems with the Legislature’s habit of distributing small and large pots of money to favored legislators. Although lawmakers have finally made budget earmarks public, the process of approving them is still far from transparent, or contested.

Scoppe: We can't get the pork out of SC budget, but we could reduce the rot

Where were the legislators asking how the state of South Carolina benefits from helping build a private hunt club? Or expanding it? Of course, even under the best system, it would have been tricky to get anybody to ask such questions about a couple of $750,000 earmarks requested by House Speaker Murrell Smith. That doesn't reduce the degree to which these expenditures illustrate the need for a different legislative mindset if not process for vetting earmarks.

Maybe the Commerce Department could have explained that, yes, building a posh-posh space for military brass was essential to keeping Shaw in South Carolina, although we’d like to think that members of our military aren’t so self-serving. Maybe the state agency would tell us that the facility's main purpose is to entertain economic development recruits, although that almost certainly could be accomplished with a taxpayer-funded membership to a private club. In any event, it’s hard to imagine a public benefit from a taxpayer-owned facility reserved for legislators and other special public officials to hunt and hang out. A private benefit to those selected VIPs, yes, but not a public benefit.

Click here for more opinion content from The Post and Courier.

Beginning Jan. 6, district students can no longer use their electronic devices during school hours.

More Videos

SUMTER, S.C. — The Sumter County School District joined the growing list of districts across South Carolina that are preparing to enact policies limiting student access to electronic devices during the school day.

It’s all part of a plan to ensure compliance with the state proviso aimed at preventing cell phones from being a distraction in the classroom.

Dr. William Wright Jr., superintendent of Sumter District Schools, shared his thoughts with fellow board members before they voted on the new electronic communication devices policy.

“It is a paradigm shift, at least on paper from what we have been doing,” Wright Jr. said.

The new policy will prohibit students from accessing their cell phones or other personal electronic devices during the school day unless those devices have been approved for classroom educational use.

Board member Shery White said the district, like all districts across the state, is implementing the policy to satisfy requirements from the state legislature.

“The legislature passed a proviso that indicated we had to have a policy composed and implemented by the first of the year. We just are required to restrict access, in some form or fashion during the school day,” White said.

Beginning Jan. 6, students will no longer be allowed to access their phones or other devices from when they arrive on campus until the dismissal bell at the end of the day.

The policy allows device use on field trips, during after-school activities, and at sports events.

White said safety was also considered during the creation of the policy.

“Our district has a very good communication ladder that they use to inform parents when things happen. We have an app, and that can be used as an instant communication device by our communication director, the principal at a school where an incident may be occurring. So there is access for the parents to be informed almost immediately,” White said.

The district says the policy does include exceptions for medically necessary devices.

At Wednesday's board meeting, members also discussed the need to survey parents and teachers next spring to determine whether any adjustments to the policy are needed.